From this article, it is evident that the authors aim at establishing a position on the effective use of the behavioral concept to come up with health promotion intrusions. By doing so, the authors use two definitions of ‘theory’ to establish their submissions. A critical analysis of the two definitions places the first definition by Collins dictionary as the best suited in establishing their position. This definition describes theory as an idea or set of concepts that explain something based on evidence and critical reasoning. However, the definition also shows that the idea in questions can at times not be completely proved. A critical reflection on the authors’ submissions, it is clear that their position on behavior theory echoes a compilation of evidence from interactive research.  This shows that the evidence can be used to develop thoughts on interventions like nutrition and physical activity in an incomplete manner. From the definition, researchers should apply theories with the aim of improving the efficacy of various relevant interventions. The second definition is inferior because it does not correlate to the submissions of the article and how the authors take their position as far as the use of behavioral theory in promoting health interventions is concerned.

From the position taken by the authors of this article, various behavioral theories seem to play a crucial role in explaining health changes and performances among a population. However, most of these theories have weaknesses as a result of their inconsistencies in predicting changes and performances in related health behaviors among a given population. The inconsistencies limit theories from projecting further interventions concerning prior knowledge and explanations. For interventions to be effective, theories related to behavioral change need to be developed based on knowledge and reliable research methodologies. This would be important in focusing on how to encourage appropriate action rather than ordinary motivation from the explanations. Predicting changes or behaviors should be motivated by the ability and opportunity to transform. So, further development of interactive change theory should integrate environmental change approaches. This shows the significance of intervention mapping in providing a variety of aspects to improve the application and development of ideas in promoting change.

The authors of this article suggest that the use of Intervention Mapping as a framework in promoting health intercession can mitigate some of the confines of behavioral theory. They believe this can be achieved by resolving to bring about change as far as health behavior is concerned. I think this is a realistic expectation as a result of two major factors. Firstly, the authors of this article suggest that Intervention Mapping proposes important procedures and provisions that act as a path towards problem-driven advancement, the application as well as the incorporation of nutrition and behavioral change concepts.  Intervention mapping also sounds realistic in this context as a result of its proposal of a systematic way of proceeding from knowledge regarding behavioral change to specific goals. This is further extended to interventions approaches based on a variety of conditions. These conditions later become responsible for the development of an ‘intervention map.’ Moreover, the use of intervention mapping is realistic because it provides a variety of pathways to improve the formulation and application of concepts that promote aspects of nutrition and behavior transformation.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?