In a democratic society, the politics of administration dichotomy is the theory that builds the boundaries in the public administration and accounts for the normative relationship between administrators and the elected officials. The Politics-administration dichotomy explains how administration and politics are inherently different and therefore should be approached differently. The administration is like a business and politics sets the responsibility of administration. On the other hand, Weberian bureaucracy is a bureaucratic theory formed by max weber to explain management principles. Max Weber believed that to set up an administration efficiently in an organization then one had to use bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is a set of rules and norms that govern an organization, enabling the administration to perform effectively. The application of Politics-Administration Dichotomy and the Weberian bureaucracy in Hong Kong had numerous features.

Politics-Administration dichotomy

Politics-administration dichotomy was to separate politics and public administration. In Hong Kong, you can only separate bureaucracy with democracy since bureaucratic leaders serve for self-interest. The dichotomy is obsolete in that without politics; administrations cannot be formed; in short, they both rely on each other’s existence. Politics in Hong Kong has something to do with policies while administration aims at executing strategies. The dichotomy of administration and procedure was not intended to control behavior, but in Hong Kong, the presence of social conflicts despises the principle. The model also had a strict definition. It is not possible to have one-way dichotomy that retains elected officials of the administration but then allows administrators to be active in the policy. The dichotomy level standing on its own is an aberration.  To have progress and objectivity, the politics must, therefore, separate from the administration. With doing the separation, every person would have equal power on their field rather than being controlled by the other. In Hong Kong, the obsolete Politics-Administration dichotomy is evident from how powerful ministries and state companies are involved in a devastating competition. If politics was to be separated from the administration, state companies could be acting independently without an interest in ministries. The ministries are expected to be involved in public administration as well as the state companies; hence there should be no competition since every enterprise has its administrative restrictions.

Weberian bureaucracy

Bureaucracy seems to be obsolete in Hong Kong since administrative reforms that have been implemented over the past few years have been a series of attacks over the hierarchical structure of the public administration. The standard arguments that go for Hong Kong bureaucracy are that it is slow, inefficient, rigid, and unable to change and it also fails to draw on the professional expertise in the organization and the external community. The bureaucracy in Hong Kong is characterized by reduced efficiency in economic administration through less established reforms. The policy making bureaucrats in Hong Kong were not democratic implying bureaucracy was applied without administrative functions.  An administration needs efficient management to perform and achieve its goals, and with bureaucracy, it’s not attainable. For an organization to play well, the bureaucracy should be mobile so that it could be changed anytime when there is a need.  For the case of Hong Kong democracy was replaced with bureaucracy since civil servants established the public policy decisions. The elected politicians cannot be entrusted with the roles assigned to them since conflicts are familiar with the social class. They also explained that it is too much formalized and standardize and the strict adherence to organizational goals and purposes. They misrepresented that bureaucracy should focus on the significant challenges they are facing in delivering public services to ensure efficacy in discharging public functions to compete effectively with private facilities. For obsolete reasons, some highly substantial changes have been implemented in the public sector.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?