Rhonda addresses the issue concerning the jargon of accruing bad debt in hospitals and the remedy. The feeling is that the above problem has negatively impacted on the operational structure of the society. It is true that increasing bad debt from uncollected patient bills has led to negative impact because a reduction in revenue has been witnessed, expenses increased, there has been a resultant slowdown in the economy, and hospitals have faced challenges of ideal normal operations.

Rhonda mentions Tenet Hospital as an ideal example of the issue. The healthcare center is the second-largest publicly traded hospital chain making it suitable as it harbors many patients. Additionally, the locality (i.e., Tenet) is mentioned as facing tribulations regarding the acute nature of bad debt. The antidote enacted by the institutions is the use of a discount policy construed to uninsured patients. The feeling is that of the failure of the solutions given revenue collected hasn’t increased. The economic slowdown has been witnessed with a lack of incentives for improvement even with its stabilization. Expenses consequently increased with the remedy lacking a productive outcome. Accounting policy requires equivalent remission of funds to charge presented to the patient. Failure to meet the standard has concretized the standoff. Whereas her meticulous analysis sounds sound, her omission of providing a clear remedy doesn’t sit easy. The entire article is critique with failure to acknowledge trial to rectify the bad debt issue. The article succeeds in illuminating the problem inclusive of the resultant adverse effects.

The intentions of the writer are unclear as she successfully illuminates the bad debt issue, however, failing to explain her exact standpoint on the antidote as recorded in the topic “Hospitals Administer Antidote for Bad Debt.” Nevertheless, Rhonda’s submissions credibly provide the impetus for the ongoing discussion on remedies of bad debt.

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?