Body organs of living organism entail tubes that are utilised for various purposes but mainly the transportation of nutrients, air, and water. The article focuses on the morphological structure of the basic unit of the tubes, that is, the epithelial cell. The report, in a summative manner, optimises the use of pictorials as well as numerous experiments to facilitate the argument of comparing the relativity of the epithelial cells in their functionality with the influence from other factors such as the apical membrane. It is an article whose construct is appreciated for substantive objectivity of the discussion mainly because, in a majority of the scenarios that the researcher elaborates the possibility of influence either stimulant or inhibitor element, it is backed up with an experiment of similar articulations.

Although the context of the article is biologically objective, it presents a challenge of significant magnitude due to the readability concept. The content of the subject entangles between full biological terms to the extent that a non-biologists capacity to understand the essential idea develops towards impossible. A high-quality research article whose framework underlies seeks to utilise a standardised level of language to attract a higher rate of readers thus playing the role of a knowledge pool. It is an original article, but its capacity of achieving higher standards of readers across the vast fields of profession becomes a problem due to the intensified level of the biological language.

A single aspect of measuring some theoretical literature is an ideology that also serves as an architecture of inefficiency. The article focuses upon the morphological phenomenon of the epithelial cells as well as the apical membrane, quite an appealing strategy although higher efficiency rate is presented through the development of such experiments under model frameworks from previous scientists that relate to the philosophies in the discussion. Such a strategy evokes the essence of the reason for utilising the test without the subjectivity of a biased experiment.

The argumentative construct of the interdependency between the hub mutants and the apical membrane is a fascinating phenomenon that demands adequate information for postulations. The hub mutant significantly functions to foster the invagination process as well as the dynamic change of the shapes of the cells through the growth regulation of the apical membrane by the inverse provisions of Klar and crb. The paradox of the same element being the reactor as well as the inhibitor challenges the quality of research conducted because it lacks to bring out the clarity of the context about the main functional points of the basic pointers within the epithelial cells. This is evident with the presentation of possibilities without the literature review of previous studies to support in the deductions. An adequate amount of prior studies in combination with the primary results enhance deductive results that are concise and precise.

In conclusion, the relationship that exists between rkb, apical membranes, crab, and Klar determine the role of the epithelial cells mainly in the formation of structures as well as the shapes. The four elements coordinate to foster the efficiency levels of the epithelial cells compared to the endothelial cells. The dynamism of the interdependency, however, challenges the context of the research article and presents challenging insights of comprehension although the blending of first experimentations with the theoretical constructs enhances the objectivity of essence.