There are different forms of leadership, based on the distribution of power. The method of governance selected is based on the needs of the people. There are various demands which led to a shift of power from local autonomous rulers to territorial rulers. They included a request for efficient property rights and markets. Additionally, due to increased population growth, there was a demand for more order which led to the shift of power. The cost of war also led to the establishment of territorial rulers. The change in power created a paradox because the sacrifice of power was made with the expectation of future benefits. The regional rulers had various advantages because they were in a position to meet the expected demands. Additionally, they were comparatively better compared to the local autonomous rulers. The institutional advantages of territorial rulers are based on their ability to meet a significant percentage of the demands which resulted in the paradox.

Territorial rulers have various institutional advantages. The benefits are based on intuitional comparatively with other potential methods f governance. One of them is the ability to affect the whole population based on the claims of territorial membership. The community is divided into different territories. As a result, the regional rulers can meet the needs and demands of the people in the population. Every member of the public has a specific territory where they belong. As a result, the leadership advantages of the territorial rulers are enjoyed by all the people in the population. The areas have set rules which govern the operation of activities. As a result, territorial rulers can influence the lives of all the people in the society.   The leaders with the qualities of kings have increased power to control their territories. As a result, the rulers are in a position to identify the needs of all the people in their territories and respond to them efficiently.

Another institutional advantage of territorial rulers is that they can use their courts to create large scale relatively efficient legal rules. These regulations are applied to deal with some of the matters affecting the people in the population. The legal rules made by these rulers are territorial. This implies that they are unique to a particular territory and are formed based on the needs of the community.  This means that with the courts of the territorial rulers, territorial rulers can efficiently address the legal matter of the people in the society.  The legal rules formulated by the provincial rulers are efficient because they are enforceable. This implies that the rulers express regulations which can be implemented in real life situations. As a result, territorial rulers are more efficient in the governance of the people in the population because of the established and enforce legal rules formulated by the courts. This implies that there is uniformity in the manner in which the rulers treat the people in the population because they depend on the already established rules.

The territorial rulers have the advantage of being able to address the needs of the people in the population. One of the main ones was the demand for property rights which will help to regulate the markets. Some of the rules established by the courts of territorial rulers are the regulations related to contracts and property rights. These policies are used to guide the interaction and transactions among the people in the territory. Additionally, they help to enhance commercial sales which are essential for the creation of wealth among the members of the areas. Thus, territorial rulers, unlike local autonomous leaders, can formulate legal rules which can be applied to all the people in the region.  This implies that they are efficient in meeting the demands of the people. Through their legal rules, they can enhance the security protection of the local groups. People can carry out economic transactions without fear of losing because they are assured of protection according to the legal rules formulated by territorial leaders.

Another advantage of territorial rulers is that they have political monopoly power. This is because they are in a position to meet most of the demands of the people in the regions they rule. As a result, they have the sole power to come up with policies which will be used in the governance of the territories. The shift in power from the local leaders was caused by the need to address more demands of the people in the society. Although there was uncertainty, it was believed that the territorial leaders would be in a position to confer a benefit to the people. With the ability to meet the demands of people, the provincial rulers have the sole power to control, the politics of the regions. They are believed to be effective in addressing the needs of the people in the population, unlike the autonomous local rulers. With the political monopoly power, the territorial rulers can come up with rules and regulations to govern the activities in the regions. Additionally, they can control and regulate the leadership policies in the territories. Thus, they are more efficient governance that the autonomous local leaders.

Territorial rulers are associated with the production of privilege.  There are a monopoly of economic opportunities. The regional rulers have the sole power to regulate the resources of the region. As a result, they can control the movement of productive resources from one area to another. With this mandate, the territorial rulers can concentrate the funds in the region they rule, and use them to increase the economic productivity of the people. This is achieved through a clear definition of membership. For a person to be allowed to use the resources for productive purposes, they should be full members of the territories. A clear description of the club, it is hard to transfer productive resources from one country to another. As a result, the territorial rulers are in a position to concentrate the resources of the territory to use them to enhance economic productivity.

Territorial leaders also have monopolies of order. As a result, they have the sole ability to maintain law and order in the region.  With the increasing rate of population growth, territorial rulers can formulate and implement policies which will govern how people relate to themselves. As a result, through the monopoly of order, regional rulers can make more binding decisions. An order was one of the main demands which led to the shift of power from the autonomous local leaders. The main aim was to establish an institution of governance which will be in a position to maintain order among the different groups of people. Through the formulation of universal policies, it is easy to keep law and order among the people. Thus, territorial rulers have a better ability to govern the people in the population than other institutions.

Another benefit of territorial rulers is that they are reliable. Unlike local rulers, they cab reached by all the people in the population. Additionally, regional leaders can enhance law and order in the regions they govern. Their reliability is also based on the fact that they have courts which can formulate legal rules to be applied to all the people. As a result, members of the population are assured of equal treatment; hence they are reliable when it comes to enhancing fairness and justice. Additionally, territorial rulers are having a monopoly when it comes to maintaining law and order.  This implies that they do not have to consult other institutions when it comes to formulation and implementation of policies.  As a result, territorial rulers are more reliable because the decision-making process is easy and fact. As a result, they are efficient in the governance and maintenance of law and order.

Institutional leaders keep the promises they made to the people. When power was shifted from the local leaders, the territorial rulers promised to ensure effective governance and maintenance of law and order. To implement this promise, they established courts which are charged with the responsibility of formulating and implementing rules which will govern the people. This implies that territorial leaders have come up with strategies to keep the promise they made top people. This has been made possible by their monopoly in governance. They have the entire mandate to implement any policy which is aimed at meeting the demands of the people like that of law and order and efficient property rights and markets. Thus, territorial rulers are associated with various advantages which make them outweigh other institutions of governance like local rulers.

In conclusion, territorial rulers have various institutional advantages, which make them outweigh other forms of governance. Their preference is based on their ability to meet the demands of the people which led to a shift of power from the autonomous local rulers. These rulers can affect the whole population by using their courts to come up with and implement large scale legal rules which are relatively efficient. Another advantage is that territorial needs cover broad areas, unlike other institutions which are narrow and small scale. Due to their full field of governance, they are in a position to meet a more extensive range of the demands of the people, hence making them more preferred. Territorial rulers are also associated with the production of privileges to the people they lead. Therefore, they are more efficient than any other institution of leadership.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?