Qualitative study emerges over the progression for development of research study. The qualitative research methodology is generally flexible data collection strategy (Polit & Beck, 2017). The chosen articles were aboutStaphylococcus aureus that is Methicillin-resistant, which is a frequent causative agent for the hospital as well as community-acquired infection, for the past decades in the United States. However, in the hospitalization events, the MRSA infection escalates based on the risk of inpatient death, hospital charges leading to over-stay of the patients. The prevalence of the infection is common in-patient patients that are under extended hospitalization management such as those that have an injury to the spinal cord. The qualitative study involves in-depth reasoning and understanding of the underlying issues as well as evidence. Moreover, qualitative research tries to provide insights into the problem set. Importantly, it offers ideas and hypotheses needed for a further quantitative study of the topic.

While quantitative research is all about quantitative of data about the infection from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the study design allows generalization of the outcome of the entire of the study population, and also provides the evaluation of the incidence of the different opinions and views involved in a given sample of interest. Moreover, once a project has employed quantitative research, there is no need to perform a follow-up study using a qualitative analysis. Therefore the study performed using this two study designs over the same topic will result in various precision and accuracy of data from the in-patient victims that may experience the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection due to a prolonged stay in the hospital leading to the attraction of nosocomial infections.

These two study methods have various challenges as witnessed from the multiple articles accessed on the same topic about the methicillin related infections due to the resistance was shown by organisms such as staphylococcus. The disadvantages highlighted from the developed topic of interest are; the qualitative research is always explorative or investigative as well. Thus, its findings are always not conclusive; therefore it is generally hard to automatically make generalizations from qualitative research. While quantitative research provides a broad insight base required for final recommendation for the typical final course, the qualitative study uses respondent’s unlimited expression while the quantitative analysis is based on the pre-formulated questions and their related questions.

The sample selection in a qualitative study is focused on a smaller number of the non-representative case. The study respondents are selected based on the expectation that they will meet specific criteria. However, the quantitative study involves sample selection based on multiple numbers of cases that are thought to represent the target population fully, and the respondents are selected at random. The qualitative analysis is not statistical in approach, and its methodological setup is dependent on the available material. While the quantitative research comprises of statistical data and often assumes the tabulation presentations, the outcome is descriptive as well as being conclusive within the statistical framework. Therefore qualitative research provides detailed, valid and precious information that is required for an in-depth understanding of the intended context. Significantly, the quantitative analyses give out reliable data which is population-based and are generalizable to establish the cause and effect of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus infection. Therefore, qualitative research is not real science, and it is conclusive. Thus the best research methodology is a quantitative study for appropriate case determination.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?