From Crawford’s experience, it is evident that office jobs inhibit or devalues knowledge and achievement. One best example given from the experience of Crawford is when he acquired an abstract writing job. First, the abstracts were of different kinds of material in humanities, social sciences, biological and physical sciences some of which were incomprehensible. Crawford was assigned abstracts of various articles that had been written by other authors and was required to write his own as the only way to add value. Even though Crawford found some abstracts not comprehensible, writing abstracts entails a given method that should be applied. So it is possible to come up with a summary without even understanding the text. Hence, this indicates that office jobs do not require knowledge of what one is doing. Unlike in the second example of working at the motorcycle repair shop,  which requires frequent complex thinking.  During his manual jobs of repairing motorcycles, Crawford had to come up with several imagined trains of cause and effect of manifest symptoms. Thus, one has to make the judgment of likelihood before you start working. Therefore, it requires knowledge of the entire process if one has to be successful in manual jobs.

In the development and flourishing, Kraut examines that human flourishing involves work that allows the exercise of multiple human powers. Kraut considers that jobs that depict repetitiveness, mindless, emotional stifling, social isolation, and those that do not offer anything that someone can enjoy as not being part of human flourishing.  In most cases, office jobs have a defined method with which a person has to apply when doing them. Thus, it is hard for a person to use various means or options to accomplish the work since no knowledge is required hence human powers are not exercised. Two human powers that fail to be applied in office jobs include cognitive and social powers. Cognitive in the sense that workers are not given an opportunity to involve rational thinking to have their solution. Then social power is limited in the sense that employees do not interact to work as a team to come up with a solution other than using the designed method. The manual work of repairing motorcycles allow both cognitive and sensory powers in the sense that one is at liberty to involve mental thinking of other various solutions to a problem. At the same time, a person can use sensory power to test multiple parts of the motorcycle to find a real problem.

Turkle describes a situation where people especially college students split their attention and focus on several things at the same time which has been brought by technology. The most common case Turkle gives is that students have gotten used to using the phones that they can be looking at the phone while attending to other matters such as listening to the teacher. Students claim the dividing attention allows them to be always available everywhere and that they can shift attention when they feel like doing so. The problem that comes with splitting attention is that students are losing friendship since they rarely focus on others when seated together. The suggested solution is that people can develop resilience where they can stay away from destructors such as phones to allow them to pay close attention.

However, splitting attention can be seen Kraut as an act that does not add to the idea of human flourishing since it denies people an opportunity to exercise some human powers. From where Kraut stands on human flouring, he identifies social and sensory powers as two significant powers that can apply in this situation. In a case where there lacks proper attention, the social relationship is affected as people may not property communication. The same way, people in conversation might lack the sense of attachment that lowers sensory power. Thus, there is no required connection between the parties in communication.

In the interview, the situation described is loneliness which is seen as a lack of social connection.  It comes out that loneliness is a feeling or a perception created in the brain of people that they lack social connection. It is a perception in the sense that a person may see the company around him as being motivated by something. The problem associated with loneliness is that people look at their neighbors or friends as a threat thus developing a negative social reaction. The solution is to have relationships that benefit both ways where nobody feels threatened.

The situation of loneliness can be seen as not being part of human flourishing based on the explanation by Kraut. In a state of loneliness both social and cognitive powers are not exercised in the sense that people may stop enjoying a good and open relationship. Someone develops a feeling threat from the surrounding and isolates himself. At the same time, possession controls the rational thinking of people.

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?