The article, the mother who says having these two children is the biggest regret of her life, was published in the Daily Mail in April, 2013. The author, Isabella Dutton uses her personal story to explore the dark side of parenting and the challenges that come with the responsibility of motherhood. The story deviates from the norm by asserting that the persona regrets having children in a society where mother rejoice upon giving birth. In essence, therefore, the story breaks form the common practice where mothers regard childbirth positively. For Isabella, her life would have been better had she not given birth to Stuart and Jo (Dutton, 2016). That notwithstanding, she confesses to loving the two children deeply and taking good care of them up to now. The article is a huge risk owing to its portrayal of motherhood in negative light.

The confidence with which the author admits her regret at having two children is unmatched given the anticipated feedback. Despite the views of the society, Isabella insists that she wishes she had remained childless at one time confessing to having resented the time her children consumed. In stating her mind, the author goes against the societal norms where women rejoice at the prospect of giving birth. The boldness with which the story is reported is evidenced in the author’s statements that the children were like parasite that took from her without giving anything in return. In a normal society, it is rare to find women speaking in such language in reference to their children. In fact, children are considered to be blessing and such language would have been taken as nothing more than a joke. The article risks igniting an uproar of condemnation from the society and especially women.

The author confesses to having made up her mind to be childless even before they got married. This confession goes against the society because there are many women who pray that they may have children in vain. Others want to have children but are not fertile enough. Yet here is a woman who had no problem related to motherhood but did not want to get children. Also, the society assumes that everyone has a responsibility of giving birth to children to follow after their ways. The fact that her husband insisted on having four children is further confusing as she herself wanted none. In her defense, Isabella asserts that most women are of similar views but are too dishonest to say so (Dutton, 2016). According to her, children usurp ones independence while using up all the finances. This is a different view regarding children as the society considers them to be blessings. In addition, the issue of finances does not arise in society since they are considered as investments that should pay up once they become older. The sentiments raised in the article are therefore risky as they go against the society’s norm.

The description of the author’s feelings upon giving birth is summed up as someone filled with disappointment. Isabella had hoped that giving birth would reignite the bond she lacked and make her feel good about motherhood for once. However, this was not bound to happen as the author was thinking of other things. Even when Stuart was in a troublesome situation after delivery, she was neither worried nor concerned. These sentiments are centrally to normal women who jump with the joy upon seeing their children for the first time. Consequently, therefore, the author risks being rebuked by the masses for not being motherly in her article. Breastfeeding is supposed to create a bond between a mother and her child but Isabella’s case was different. Although she did breastfeed, she only did so because she never intended to hurt her children but there was no bond created. In fact, Isabella admits to having wished she never had Stuart whenever she breastfed him. These thoughts are normally suppressed in society and their expression considered abnormal even when true.  By sharing her sentiments, Isabella risked her persecution in the public court for being un-motherly.

The birth of her children should have sparked hope of a better feeling in Isabella but it did not. According to her, she always viewed Stuart and Jo as intruders who made her life unhappy. For instance, all outings became expeditions as she had to take care of her children. These thoughts are contrary to the norm as most parents become happy whenever they are with their children. In fact, some parents have reported to being relieved off stress whenever they play with their children (McGhee & Mary, 2014). In one instance, Isabella left her child with her dog outside a bakery as she went shopping. This action is against the ideals of parenthood as she exposed the child to danger. Moreover, she forgot the child together with the dog outside the bakery and only realized of the mistake after she had taken a cup of tea back at home. Even after realizing something was amiss, Isabella admits that she was mostly concerned about the dog and not her child. These actions are against the societal thinking and therefore constitute a risk on the part of the article.

Works cited

McGhee, Paul E., and Mary Frank. Humor and children’s development: a guide to practical applications. Routledge, 2014.

Dutton, Isabella. “The Mother Who Says Having These Two Children Is the Biggest Regret of Her Life.” Mail Online. Associated Newspapers, 2016. Web. 04 Nov. 2016.

 
Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?