Introduction

Marx developed theories which analyzed the connectivity of circumstances and situations between modern capitalism and specific historical conditions. Marx, however, focuses majorly on the past situations that resulted in capitalism. Marx discusses the alienated human nature through a historical review throughout the historical periods of social behaviors to be applied to the ideologies of life. In the analysis of the concepts employed in reality of life, Marx writes about the instruments of the economy that show themselves as culturally driven historical changes. In the specter of activism, activists should be open in the opinions of the world and publicly publish their views. Marx states that the specter of activism is greatly haunting the world’s silence. In the wrath of political emaciations and capitalism has been the order of the day.

Marx and the newspapers all concerned with the originality and advancement of current capitalism. In financial times, religion and Calvinism is an essential factor for capitalist development. However, Marx elaborates capitalism. As a result of material condition and religion of the complex structure in the society which generates from the material base in history. In Marx’s theories, social changes can be brought about by ideas and perspectives whereas for Marx. The causal relationship is indirectly proportioned with the outcomes of material conditions. Thus, Marx emphasizes the conservative force of religion.

Moreover, both the article and Marx have primary capitalism elements

According to both parties, they argue that religion has a functional value to capitalism. The newspaper analyses capitalism from the subjective view while Marx emphasizes on the working class bringing about capitalism. Marx, however, agrees that the religious perspective of individuals effectively influences the psychology and the individual agency. Marx, however, outlines religion as an element of oppression. Marx describes morality to be exploited by individuals by negativity and positivity.

According to Marx, praxis is a critical concept as the philosophical seeking of truth is manifested in a quietistic manner[1]. For Marxism, the understanding of praxis is based on truth seeking yet there is no articulated manner of how human practices obtain the fact. Marx viewed praxis as the concept of philosophical science is vital to understand the world and to try to act in a manner that prompts to change. Praxis is, therefore, the activity and practice through which people do in the actual world. Although there is a difference existing in praxis and theory where individuals try to imagine on the theoretical implications in practical implementations.

Marx analyzed praxis to redefine the structures of human theories. He declined the perspective that the assumptions were philosophical keys to ensure that they provided answers to any queries concerning the quest for truth. The motive behind the analysis on praxiswas the mode of production in praxis was in its usual standards. Marx resulted in dynamic academic revolution. All theories based on legal, moral and philosophical matters which went in line with the political economy as Marx regarded the concepts as backbones behind human behaviors.

Marx’s attempts to dogmatically prove the social development down to particular formalities tend to enhance the overall completion of regression. The theory of ideology is only limited to the political economy for personal subject[2].  The model of ideology is a conspiracy of the capitalists in that the workers who operate with an ideology so that they do not realize capitalization nature. The class of capitalists is subject to appearances and models of doctrine in production in the exploited class. The subjection develops capitalism mode of production. Additionally, the roles of the society were concealed in that the exploiters in the economy would not be in a position for composure and experience resentment.

Conclusion

The mode of contradiction requires additional adjustments to contradict the way of production. Marx perceived social science as a negative conception. The crucial nature of this mode of production is to identify the traits of society. The ideas of Marx manifested by Marx are aimed at proving the other theorist of philosophy as non-scientists of life theories. Marxism held the view that there is an actual contradiction existing between human nature and had to work in a capitalist society. Marx put it clearly that capitalism is no longer a social set up but a political system. Marx had the belief that there is deviance like individual trait being different from the formalities of society. This is made to the inference of the community not accepting the behavior. Through, Marxism develops the education system in which moves the community ahead. Any system without education prompts failure thus lack of job opportunities.

Bibliography

Aronowitz, Stanley. The crisis in historical materialism: Class, politics, and culture in Marxist theory. Springer, 2016.

Mouffe, Chantal, ed. Gramsci and Marxist Theory (RLE: Gramsci). Routledge, 2014.

[1]Aronowitz, Stanley. The crisis in historical materialism: Class, politics, and culture in Marxist theory. Springer, 2016.

[2]Mouffe, Chantal, ed. Gramsci and Marxist Theory (RLE: Gramsci). Routledge, 2014.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?