The utilitarian theory assumes that the best actions are those which ensure that there is the maximisation of the utilities. In this theory, the utility is a measure of satisfaction in human beings and other sentient animals. Leadership, however, is the ability to show direction and influence change in any given environment. Reconciling leadership in the utilitarian theory presupposes that leaders have the objective of ensuring that a large number of people are happy and that people are given proper treatment. Leaders in the practical context apply the principle of equality and equity in making decisions as opposed to the appeal to egoism and altruism in some other theories that are used in the other arguments.

Leaders, in the utilitarian context, implore that actions are designed according to the desired results. In this form of decision-making, there are two points that leaders rely on before making decisions which are; the current position and the desired position. The current situation is the current state which is also the actual state of events while the desired position is the ideal state which is based on the objectives that have been set in the leadership. The leaders, therefore, design ways and actions that influence people from the current state to the ideal state. However, utilitarianism can affect leaders to make decisions based on the likely results from the activities, a condition known as the act utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism which ensures that the present agents are to show the conformity to the existing rules, and both maximum and minimum utilitarianism. Deciding a leader in the context of utilitarianism is an essential aspect that works by ensuring that people are happy and achieve the highest degree of satisfaction from the activities.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?