Following the 2010 commission of the oil pipeline system in the United States and Canada through the Keystone pipeline system, the ownership has adversely changed. It is now solely owned by the TransCanadaCorporation, a case that has dramatically affected the indigenous people whose lands were trespassed during the piping system. The effect runs across the Sedimentary Basin of Western Canada especially in Alberta to all refineries in Texas and Illinois. The pipeline in Calgary only became known in the fourth phase of all the problems and attracted mild environmental opposition leading to a serious battle over fossil fuels and climate change. Several resistance have been realized due to oil sands expansion, making the crude oil in Canada be moved to the south where the pipeline will only connect with the old pipeline network to take the oil away from the reach of people.

Background of The Keystone Pipeline system

The Keystone Pipeline system haddifferent operational phases that range from the Gulf Coast Pipeline Project and phase I-III. Further expansion of the pipeline system failed because of the adequate permit for its construction from the federal government. We have been in a severe limbo since then. However, the development of Phase III was started as an economic utility thereby limiting its access by the local people. The building which took twoyears only rendered us susceptible to economic retardation.

Similarly, Keystone Phase IV which was the 2012 revised proposal reveals a segregated approach of laying the pipes to an only specific individual. Although several barrels were used to transport the crude oil from one region to the other, the ultimate convergence was well outlined limiting the indigenouspeople from accessing the product. Our plea is that you remain steadfast and help us come out of thing menace.

Moreover, the first operation of the Keystone Pipeline System which covered several kilometers has been reduced, resulting in int less quantity of crude oil in Calgary. Similarly, Canada also experienced a mild conversion of the pipeline delivery thereby decreasing the amount of crude oil that is being dispensed. Only a few indigenous people managed to survive from the reductions. It is our esteem calls that these problems be addressed in your next sitting for transparency to be obtained. The created phases have different impacts on the lives of the indigenous people who were either affected by the environmental factors or the brutal federal government policies.

The Keystone XL controversies

The Keystone XL proposal was met by mild criticism from both theminority members of the Congressfrom the United States as well as the environmentalist. The rejection of proposal on application by the U.S president led to increased environmental sensitivity in Nebraska sandhill regions, resulting in oppositions of any possible further development. The TransCanada Corporation also changed the original proposedof Keystone XL route to reduce land, water resources, and particular areas. The new course significantly affected the indigenous people because their lives and land were not spared. Upon resisting, they were subjected to harsh treatments that were against their constitutional rights.

Current official statement

The ratification of the Keystone pipeline system has led to mild attention from both the local and government bodies to ensure that the indigenous people also benefit fr, the crude oil. Indigenous leaders from Canada and U.S who gathered in Calgary declared a strong opposition against the adjacent proposals on the Keystone Pipeline system. It was confirmed that the coalition representatives must come together to calm the situation before it goes out of hand.

Opposition to the pipeline system expansion

A 16-page declaration highlighted the treaty and the opposition rights about the huge proposals that were formulated for future action. This document also contained the opposition against Albertaoil sand expansion. Example of agitated quotes which were against further expansion includes, “We don’t oppose development, and we don’t oppose other exploration opportunities for various tribes at their discretion.” Renowned personals made this in the government in support of the lives of the indigenous people. As the Member of Parliament in Calgary, it is your mandate to create a real relationship between the conflicting parties to reduce unnecessary oil loss.

Oppositional Statement

Opposing views claim that the introduction of the Keystone pipeline system was aimed at bringing the TransCanada policies together for a common goal. Similarly, it was argued that both the Aboriginal Relations and the American relation policy were to come together to maintain a pipeline system which is environmentally safe for job creation and economy boosting. Additionally, an environmental coalition group challenged all the federal court permission purposely to keep a stable environment for study as opposedto the belief of the indigenous people. Overall, it is my humble plea that to take keen consideration of the issues and help Calgary finds an immediate solution that will not affect the indigenous people.

Yours faithfully,

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?