Referring to the prior decisions made by the international court of justice regarding the case at hand, it follows that it is important to have an accurate representation of the legal precedent, and our primary focus should be on each state. International law and decisions should be a reflection of how each state view the world, and this cannot happen when interests in the case are in sharp conflict. The great interests in the case would render the verdict of the judicial settlement unacceptable if no agreement or prior information was given regarding the decisions that create precedents. Article 38(1) of the ICJ statute clearly states the function of the court in making decisions in accordance with international law to such disputes as are submitted to it.
Can the same be said in relation to violations of International Law? No, we cannot compare the international law with the domestic legal system. This is because; the international community does not have one legislature, judiciary, executive and police to enforce the law. However, citizens have certain fundamental rights that the government should not deny them.
Is International Law really Law?
International law is a real law when its principles and decisions are enforced beyond state consent and also goodwill among parties to a treaty. Similarly, international law is a real law when it possesses different characteristics from the domestic settings.
The legal system of the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases has embarked on a dual requirement for forming customary international law. They include the state practice or the objective element and the opinio juris or the subjective element. According to the case, the state practice of importance was for those states whose interests relied and were affected by the custom. Similarly, uniform and consistency practice was important to show opinion juris. Moreover, the case banished the myth that stated, the duration of practice was a critical factor in forming the customary international law.
If “yes” how is the reservation affecting each of the treaty relationships between D and each of the others – A, B, C? When a treaty is entered between countries A and D, the reservations advocated by country D will encourage a wider participation in the treaty through practical compromise.
It refers to the peremptory principles of the international law that does not permit derogation. These principles are recognized and accepted by the international community and helps in maintaining international legal order.
8. Which treaties are considered “a source of international law” under article 38 ICJ Statute?
According to article 38 ICJ, the general treaties or law-making treaties constitute the primary source of international law. Similarly, they are treaties that are in force and binding upon the parties to certain dispute.
Since all nations are now considered civilized, we shall consider the established principles of law that are common to all major legal systems. The established principles of law include abuse of right or good faith.
It refers to a state which the existing customary law would not apply to it due to the following criteria. First, if at the initial stages, it objected to any outside attempts to apply the rule in a consistent manner. Second, if the other states did not object to her resistance.
It is important for Panama to comply with the resolution for its benefit. However, competent representative of the country should come out and try to solve the issue at hand. The president of the republic can request for a dialogue and assure the United Nations that they will fulfil the responsibility of dealing with the problem. Also, the budget committee of the national assembly can reduce the amount of money allocated to Carnivals to reduce the cost. They should address the benefits they get from the festival which is usually regarded as unique and enjoyable. On the other hand, the UN General assembly would like to protect the source of water in the region since during the celebrations a lot of water is wasted.
It refers to a written form of an agreement that has been concluded between states and governed by international law. Similarly, it involves whether the agreement is embodied in a single, two or more instruments and whatever the designation.
These are acts that create unilateral legal obligations to the acting state.
Treaties are concluded by competent individuals who represent the States. They include the Head of States, Head of government, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Heads of Diplomatic Missions and they are all presumed to have such power to conclude a treaty.
According to third states, treaties do not create obligations or rights without their consent. Also, treaties create laws between states which are parties of it.
The principle states that all the signatories should upheld the international treaties. It is a principle that is based on good faith. Therefore, agreements must be kept.
It entails the basis for the termination or suspension of the treaty obligation. Moreover, it is based on the radical transformation of such obligations due to unforeseen change of situations which encompassed primary basis of the party’s agreement to the treaty.
Monism advocates that both internal and international law should be regarded as a unified legal system. States should not translate international law into national law. On the other hand, dualism postulates that distinction should be made between the national and international law.
Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?