The world’s most luxurious musical festival that was planned to happen in April 2017 turned into a complete disaster. Several world-leading models had attended the concert which was meant to take two days, but the introduction of Fyre phenomenon made the event to become the laughing stock on the internet. The documentary expose of Hulu’s Fyre and Netflix Fyre revealed the existence of ethical concern because the two films had a similar subject. This made both films to go instantly and notoriously viral based on their content and mode of production. The film, Fyre Fraud is an American documentary that was directed by Julia Willoughby and Jenner Furst. Netflix’s Fyre is a documentary film directed by Chris Smith.   Both films take an ethical orientation toward their subject matter. This paper seeks to explain the structure, production, approaches and different moral quandaries in Hulu’s Fyre Fraud and Netflix’s Fyre films.

Both films, Hulu’s Fyre Fraud, and Netflix’s Fyre follow a similar basic structure.  They help us to understand the origin of the idea using the life of the event organizer and the media founder based on the festival mismanagement that occurred. The disastrous beginning marked the event after a ridiculous failure in serving of food. Hulu’s Fyre Fraud demonstrates significant support to the competitor. Besides revealing the Netflix documentary, he makes an effort to talk with MacFarland himself in a lengthy sit-down. However, the off-camera captures their discussion where Fyre Fraud attempts to convince him to accept the allegations of wire fraud. In Netflix’s Fyre, a more empathetic is used to engage McFarland on matters concerning the crimes of wire fraud. The two incidences indicate how both films convince us ethically by using hard-hitting investigative people to track hidden information.

Netflix’s Fyre: The Greatest Party That Never Happened gives a completely dishonest display on what appears on the screen.  The film contains several interviews with the team that controls the social media of the festival, that is, the people that protect the image of the music event while knowing that it will not work out. The team avoids revealing to the attendants about the production of the film at the time of introduction.  The decision made by the team implies that individuals should not violate the ethical standards of an event even though they doubt its success. The film further allows the team to discuss erasing the designed online queries about the planned festival as well as the overall social media dishonesty. According to the film, this action seemed to be directive by most influential people and the team had little to say about it; therefore they cannot challenge them on the assertions made.  On the other hand, Hulu’s Fyre Fraud interrogates a former employee at Jerry with a relatively low charitable consideration on their environment.

The existence and close simultaneous release of the two films presents an exciting mystery. Though both films talk about a person who commits fraud as well as his devastatingly planned festival, they demonstrate the ethical concern in their ways. For instance, the two films show how the individuals who involve themselves in convincing a large number of guests ultimately gain a lot from the productions. Besides, the same people take advantage of the locally available Bahamian labour without making the payments. The scenario also questions the ethical standards of people and teaches them a lesson on how to practices ways that are lawful and legal. Regardless of each film exhibiting a unique artistic function beyond the inherent hypocrisy, the unfolding of events in both scenarios encourages people to investigate their narratives.

Hulu’s Fyre Fraud film documentary deserves the right to be watched the first as compared to Netflix’s Fyre; however, there seem to be boundaries limiting its distribution to countries without the approval of Hulu. Netflix’s Fyre: The Greatest Party That Never Happened demonstrates its availability and influence in convincing people to follow ethical frameworks. The film further emphasizes on building a strong ethical environment that would encourage members of the public to respond to matters concerning them equitably and rationally. Netflix’s Fyre presents a case of investigative journalism where the director Chris Smith uses a direct approach to benefit himself.  The two films feature the original expensive trailer that was meant for Fyre Festive; however, their content resonates the interview information captured in Netflix document.

The film, Hulu’s Fyre Fraud is more compromising as compared to Netflix’s Fyre. It is considered one of the undoubtedly the weird movie. The film tries to reveal the court credential galore that were once read out by other individuals in controversial circumstances. Despite its odd sounding, the film keeps on shining. For instance, the movie relates the festival to a traditional business failure sending a compromising message to the stakeholders. In the vent where an ethical decision is made, most people likely to be affected would be the participants in the festival. It is evident that the team making the introduction knows about the likelihood of the festival failing but does not alert the attendants in both films.

Netflix’s Fyre film documentary uses an empathetic approach when handling the case of MacFarland, though the strategy does not help to excuse his crime allegations. The film ends up nicely as compared to Hulu’s Fyre fraud because of its comprehensive narrative arc. The ethical requirements of filmmaking make the questionable territory of both films. This is a clear indication that they take into consideration moral orientation and fare judgment. The type of narrative used in Hulu’s Fyre fraud film is more challenging compared to Netflix’s Fyre.

In conclusion, both films present the ethical framework and convince people to follow their approaches. They have unique, different production but depict a similar structure in dealing with moral concern for the people. The decision to be made in response to a moral problem would affect the festival attendees, business associates, and employees. These people make up the stakeholders for ethical environments demonstrated in both movies. On the ethical basis, the director of the film Netflix’s Fyre: The Greatest Party That Never Happened Chris Smith responds to the festival like a real crime saga with the intention of revealing the fraudster.   Netflix’s Fyre uses a more polite approach to branding MacFarland with anxieties as he takes part in defrauding the potential investors who had been exposed to desperate situations. Hulu’s Fyre presents MacFarland as an individual with borderline sociopathic.

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?