Introduction

Academic work should be coupled with facts and information that can be verified and has a legitimate source. However, in most scenarios, this is usually not the case as the most sources such as websites have on-authentic information. It’s therefore essential to assess the validity of website information’s to determine which best fit for an academic research paper is. CRAAP analysis (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and propose) is a way of analyzing the validity of academic source to determine if the article is acceptable for use in an academic setting. This document will provide an assessment of three websites to find out which is the best for an academic research paper using the CRAAP test.

The Nutrition Data

Currency.

This tests the timelessness of the information. From the nutrition website, is searched for a topic on the healthiest breakfast. The information that I obtained was posted on September12, 2016, by Christine Byrne. This is barely two years plus but the information has not yet been revised or updated irrespective of rampant changes in food engineering and research. Many things have changed and discoveries made hence it’s expected that the information I got might have changed wholly or in combination. The links are functional, and the search tools are effective. However, its website does not match the contents’ currency.

Relevance

The information provided by the article from this website satisfied my need and covered my question perfectly well. The intended audience is adult and vegetarians to be specific. However, the information provided is too advanced and contained extreme details that were not necessary according to my needs. Before I chose this source, I had visited a variety of other sources.

Accuracy

This accesses the reliability, correctness, and truthfulness of the content. The article from the website does not indicate where the information came from. This makes it abet unreliable for academic research as it does not provide evidence to support what it claims to be the best breakfast. From personal knowledge I can’t very fry the information neither am I able to get it from other sources. However, the tone is neutral, and the language is clear and comprehensive. There is no spelling, rammer or typographical errors.

Authority

The author of the information is Christine Byrne. According to the credentials given by the website, Christine is a freelance food writer and recipe developer. Very little is provided about the author that can help ascertain her qualification to write on the topic. There is also no contact information for the auther.NutritionData.com was launched in 2003 and has grown to provide useful nutritional information and analysis web. Its owner is CondeNet. Most of its information comes from National Nutrients Database for Standard Reference and listings provided by food manufacturers and restaurants.

Purpose

This relates to the reason for excised of the information. The purpose of the information was basically to inform, and most of the articles on the website are informative. The author does not only make the intention clear but also achieve it. However, since there is no reference to ascertain its source, it’s difficult to state whether its fact, opinion or propaganda. The point of view, however, appears objective and impartial. There is no bias in the article regarding political, ideological religious personal or institutional context.

ChooseMyplate

Currency

The information on most nutritious breakfast on this website was posted on 2nd January 2019, sponsored by United States Department of Agriculture. Since the information is barely a month old, it’s current and has not come to a need of an update. The topic requires current information and found this more reliable.The links in this website are fictional and effective. Since this is a US government. The site is also protected by SSL (Secure Socket Layer) certificate that has been signed by the US government. Its copyright and protection policy is updated and matches with the content.

Relevance

The information from this website is very reliable to my topic and perfects satisfied my needs. The content is rich, and all build on the topic. The target audience for this is college students. The information is moderate; at an appropriate level, comprehensive and straightforward. I would be very comfortable using this source as a source for my research paper. On relevance, the website has important information. Have visited a variety of other sources before settling on this.

Accuracy

The information for this website is coming from government research findings and publications, reliable private research firms and nutritional consultants. The information is quite supported with facts and evidence making it reliable and more of truth. The information is also available on The Independent website (https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health). The language is not biased at all and is free from emotions. The article is also free from grammatical and typographical errors.

Authority

The sponsor of this document is the United States Department of Agriculture. The credentials are given and contact information including telephone number and email for the department. Since this is a government site, its credibility is high on authority.

Purpose

The purpose of the article is to educate on healthy feeding especially when taking a break first. The sponsor brings out and fulfills the intentions meant for the article. There are flow and connection between the topic and the content. This information is based on facts and not propaganda or opinion. In its content and information, the article is coupled with western culture as the type of ingredients and preparation for the breakfast is more of western people way of life.

The Nutrition source

Currency

The information was published on May 11, 2016, by Markham Head. Since then, the information has never been revised or updated. This makes it somehow unreliable because changes in research and discoveries might have made it outdated. The topic requires current information and past information though may be helpful may not do quite well. The lines provided by the website are reliable and functional. Also, the website’s copyright does not match the content’s currency, but it’s just a standard range.

Relevance

The information relates to the topic and perfectly covers my needs.This article has no intended audience as it’s too general and accommodating. However, it can best suit the working group or anyone on a busy daily schedule. The information is appropriate in that it is not too elementary neither is it too advanced for my needs. Have looked variety of other sources before settling on this.

Accuracy

The information for the article is retrieved from government websites such as USDA, private research websites and documentaries. The work is cited to provide evidence for the information source. However, the information has not been reviewed since when it was posted on the website. The information can be verified from other sources. The language used is unbiased, free of emotions and simple to understand. The article is free of topographical, spelling and grammatical errors.

Authority

The article is from Harvard T.H.Chan School of Public Health which i9s committed to producing health leaders and experts. The university as a research center brings together dedicated group of global leaders and experts and works with them to produce powerful ideas that can help improve health and lives of people everywhere through publications that are made through its website.

Purpose

The primary purpose of this information is to educate on the best and healthy breakfast meal. The Author makes his intentions and proposes clear by maintaining a simple and good flow of content. The information is also based on facts and not propaganda. However, it’s also coupled with his ideas. The point of view appears objective and impartial as from an organized perspective. There is no personal, institutional religious ideological, cultural or political bias in the article.

Conclusion

From the evaluation of the three websites, the site that is most authentic and credible is the ChooseMyPlate, which is sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture. This website has accurate, current, relevant and purposive. The information is also based on facts hence it can be termed as knowledge. The information from Nutrition source is not current therefore may not be relevant too while that from Nutrition Data does not only fail to be relevant but also is not based on referenced facts thus can’t be considered as knowledge. I would, therefore, use ChooseMyPlate for my academic research paper.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?