My relationship with food is one that I nourish daily. I perceive food as a fuel to my body. Its intention is to nourish and sustain me. I love eating ethically produced food, and because of the environmental ethics, I feel morally obligated to restrain from taking animal products. Most factory farms in the country have unsanitary living conditions that require the use of antibiotics on animals. My experience with food on a daily basis depends on my personal choices. I usually drive to grocery stores to pick food, prepare them and sit down with my family for a meal. As a member of the Anchorage community, eating a diet composed of ethically produced food is morally justified since it complies with the moral standards of my community. I believe that healthy diet changes the way a person feels.

The main argument of in vitro meat is enhancing healthy lives, reducing the emission of greenhouse gasses and controlling climate crisis. Therefore, I am persuaded by this argument. It would be appropriate to live in a society that produces meat that is environment-friendly and improves public health. Regarding the animal rights perspective, in vitro meat will reduce violation of animal rights since the meat would be made out of the animal cells.

Singer and Regan might say that the morality of in vitro meat is acceptable since it will help to reduce animal suffering and preserve the environment. Besides, they might say that in vitro meat permits ethical consumption. The introduction of this technology will change my relationship with food because it considers the environmental ethics.

The questions include the following. First, do you think consumers determine the creation of ethical practices in the food industry? Second, some individuals might feel that in vitro meat is not natural, but what are the ethical importance of naturalness?

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?