Abstract

This research proposal project will explain issues about climate bond market which has relatively been developing internationally in both the institutional and retail segments over the last few years. The study will address the key aspects accountable for the upsurge in supply and demand for climate bonds. The relationship that exists both in the tendencies observed from climate bond in addition to the factors outlined to manage risk in respect with economic spheres will be discussed. The government appreciates necessary measures the dependent, as well as civic sectors, are playing to combat climate change. Investors in the climate bond market in this particular research will encompass pension funds with ecological, communal and supremacy (ESG) approval to communally responsible investments (SRI).

The two investors towards the green bond market will primarily focus on retail investors, all finding the avenues to expand their investments techniques through their portfolios. Basing the statistics provided over the last few years, the green bond market has experienced unprecedented growth shift margins compared with other entities who has taken solid measures to mitigate climate changes through continuous and appropriate sustainable actions towards the issue (Balboa 2016, p. 34).

The research methodology will employ the quantitative and qualitative approaches because the topic of the proposal involves a presentation of both hypothetical method and preliminary examination. Secondary information will be the primary reference of information for the study projects certain its full overview. Basing the previously documented literature, it shows that many scholars have studied and thoroughly explored the topic to showcase their analysis of the situation given the data available at a particular moment. In this study, it will showcase two types of hypothesis:

Ho – there is a significance difference between the intensified demand and the supply of climate bonds result to a reduced disclosure of risk for the venture capitalist.

H1 – there will be no significance difference between the impacts of investments should create, and even what investments areas may count as green.

The project will run for two months. After completion of the project, the discussion will follow to validate the outcomes of the project as well as projecting the future outlook of the project. This summary of green bond market contends that future development of the firm will entirely depend upon the ability of issuers to fund projects, the issue at scale, and involve with stakeholder-supported standards for content and effect, while simultaneously coping up with the financial needs and sustainability-related expectations of investors.

Introduction

In the urge to mitigate the effects of climate change, the global umbrella as a family has dedicated proper measures in putting up concerted efforts. Stemming from sustainability consideration for own benefits and those of our neighbors and our generations (Chowdhury, Datta & Mohajan 2013, p. 105). They are laying out essential strategies and regulations, technological inventions and a genuine desire to make good use of them. To combat climate change globally and adaptation project, capital expenditure is mostly a bottle-neck, since ordinary investors usually regard those projects as having a high risk for securing their returns. In the debt market, project finance is a possibility for some well-structured projects (Breen & Campbell 2017, p.16). Bank loans are not forthcoming for projects which are not producing cash streams for repayment. This is due to the benefits of climate mitigation being intangible in many instances, especially in the short term projects.

Considering some countries have used bonds to fund their infrastructure projects that are environmentally friendly elements, their use is ad hoc and depends on the market factors as to whether they are conducive to the insurance of bonds. Such factors would include the prevailing market interest rates, the risk appetite of investors, credit ratings, the liquidity of the secondary market (Bergset & Fichter 2015, p.119). Contrasting between bank loans and bonds, the former offers more flexibility regarding issue size, timeliness, negotiability and involves less transaction cost (Hui 2016, p.1).

Background

In most cases, green bonds market is designed like conventional bonds. Debtor’s issue a donation memorandum, and a third party underwrites the financing, investors finance, plus within a period that capital is repaid with interest. In this case; however, there is one substantial variance. The variation entails the money given by investors to green bond market issuers finance particular investments coined to mitigate pollution as well as the impacts of change in global climate, encouraging uncontaminated energy, taking care of the surrounding as well as lowering our reliance on renewables (Wenxin, Nguyen & Narayanaswamy 2016, p. 5). Therefore, instead of drawing an inference from the standard ground in most corporate bond provisions, for example, that the incomes will be “utilized for overall corporate purposes,” green bond market establish transparency into a particular expenditure of earnings from the issuance.

Every investor in the green bond market can follow the utilization of their fund then later affirm that the project is devoted to ameliorating change in global climate as well as having an effect on the environment (Della Croce, Kaminker & Stewart 2011, p.1). As shareholders have taken up sureness in funds after the sub-prime catastrophe, plus scooping gains of the effective reduced-cost rate of the environment, bonds possesses a function related to bank credits in funding maintainable growing investments internationally (Avery 2016, p.1).

The “GREEN” aspect and clearness of utilization of proceeds is the fundamental difference that green bonds hold over others firms (Climate Bond Initiative n.d., p.1). There are others with the same title, but there are of less important. For example, on top of obtaining a standard bond rating, some green bonds receive a so-called “second opinion” from an independent outside agency, certifying their “GREEN” credentials (Della Croce, Kaminker & Stewart 2011, p.4). Moreover, as people might anticipate with an upcoming security issue, the secondary market for green bonds is currently somewhat uneven. Nonetheless, the bigger number of those purchasing green bonds seem to be “buy and hold” investors (S&P Global Ratings 2016, p.4).

This study will exhaust the key players who will be referenced and involved throughout in this green bond market project. They include; the World Bank (IBRD), the climate bond initiative (CBI) and international finance corporation (IFC) (DuPont et al. 2015, p.25). A case study will be useful since it will demonstrate the ideologies and plans of climate bonds plus the serious triumph issues over a comprehensive literature analysis.

Market Overview

In association with the reported rising as far as climate change is concerned, current investors have been attracted by the recorded significant growth interest in the green bond market. 2015 had a reward of $41.8 billion worth of green bonds issued in comparison to 2013’s $11, making it triple the number of times of growth stipulate over the last two years (Climate Bonds Initiative 2015, p. 1). 2016 indicated a steady progress in the bonds distributed. The appeal of green bonds appears to be primarily as a result of the tax exclusions (Kochetygova & Jauhari 2014, p.3). A new issue is a necessity by specific corporate that is performing well to involve in a fresh track of products that enables them to give aid to determinations intended at combating weather variation (Veys 2010, p. 24).

Most corporations are recognizing the danger that weather changes possess for the forthcoming of their business. They are open-minded towards opportunities so as to stream their investment in a green budget relating a switch to the low-carbon economy (Sustainability 2014, p. 4). Meeting the anticipated findings, it will result in an additional 4.5% rise in the expenditure of infrastructural investments in the span of fifteen years (Cranford, Parker & Trivedi 2011, p.34).

The state is concerned with making sure that the green bond program is supplemented with appropriate strategies that force companies to desire for climate bonds. The great urge for climate bonds is recently at its uppermost stage. An essential part of communally accountable shareholders has dedicated themselves to spend quantified sums of finance into green bonds (Mathews & Kidney 2012, p.340). Referring some reports documented to back up the development forecasts of the bond market designate that, since 2014, seventeen commercial organizations, as well as official shareholders, assured to escalate their green bond assets (Saha 2016, p.1). With such dedications, the need is set to go higher resulting in higher growth in 2017 in comparison with earlier years. There is also progress in dedicated green bond funds.

Consequently, it is of health benefit for the green market bond to plan and note the problems that it would face during its rapid expansion. Risk management aims to help green bond market to understand what risk the firm has and minimize impact where possible (Avery 2016, p.1). For this to be effective, risk management model has to be applied which start by identifying the risk – assess – evaluate and then control and monitor the risk factor in the firm. The markets have a substantial share remained as a result of the state press for corporations to lessen their carbon discharges in link with the Paris change of global climate agreement (Jackson 2017, p.1). The urge gave rise to a huge progress in the climate bond economy with which it was ineffectively handled. The major problem economy is facing originates when there are no of the proper guideline is that such bodies are holding advantages of the gaps to give alleged climate bonds whose incomes do not substantially help ecological maintainability determinations (Climate Bonds Initiative 2015, p.1).

Purpose/Aim of the Research

The purpose of this project examines the climate bond market plus vital issues accountable for the upsurge in supply and demand. Discoveries will aid to offer references to the climate Bond Enterprise on avenues of upgrading the victory of climate bonds on an international gauge as well as the paybacks of the dangers decline imposed to shareholders.

Problem Statement

China is increasingly playing a critical role in its rapid economic growth. By being the second largest economy, Kidney (2013, p.44) states that regulators in the Chinese market are pushing for a green market reform in the finance sector to propel sustainable economic growth. The current development situation of green investment in the Chinese market could be perceived from the following three aspects. The first aspect is the banking (green credit) sector. Second, one could understand it with regards to the environmental pollution liability insurance (Jackson 2017, p.1). The last element is securities, which encompasses emission trading market. Each aspect faces certain issues for future growth, to name a few. Due to high rise in environmental degradation and pollution, green bond markets seeks to curb this global challenge by employing adequate heightened supply and demand of capital debts markets and control future similar challenges that may arise (Heinkel, Kraus & Zechner 2001, p.435).

Research Aim and Objectives

1. The project will analyze the information linking the climate bond market trends with risk management issues in the economic platforms.
2. The study will examine the benefits of climate bond market as a financial instrument that shareholders are using in transforming to a reduced gas emission economy in meeting the objectives of climate bonds policies sketched in the Paris signed a contract.
3. Contrast data on the distribution of funds in the global market.

Deduce whether there are advantages of expanding and renovating the structure of climate bonds, as well as the way, are issued to improve growth, efficiency, and spread.

Research Questions

Question 1

What are the pushing factors underlying an intensified supply and demand of climate bonds in debt commercial markets?

Question 2

Can green bonds help mitigate climate changes by employing suitable Risk management procedures?

Question 3

What are the international experiences and lessons on green bonds about climate change mitigation?

 

Question 4

What are the real motivations of both issuers plus financiers in the climate bond market?

Hypothesis

The intensified demand and supply for climate bonds in liability investment economy is a result of reduced danger disclosure for financiers.

Research Methodology

The study’s primary objective is to explore the possibilities of applying the green bonds market program to tackle the climate change issue. The research is mainly centered in line with the circumstance of the current climate bond market with empirical evidence. Project thesis is perceived from the following three angles.

First, the literature review will have the topic on green bond conceptualized by determining the current green bond market size, green bond history, issuer, green bond features, categories, and principle.

Second, the thesis will encompass the analysis of green bond issuance in the context of current Chinese green financial system and air pollution situation.

Third, the study will provide a reflection and discussion of the demand, incentives, and challenges of issuing green bonds to mitigate climate change issue.

Qualitative analysis, case study analysis, stakeholder analysis methods and interviews are applied in this paper for this inter-disciplinary research. Both inductive and deductive methodology will be used in this study. As such, both qualitative and quantitative measures will be applied and used in harmonizing findings linked to the project subject. The rational approach will mainly focus on the questions geared on hypothetical perspective. The concept of demand and supply will be used to facilitate and decide potential features behind the enlarged markets for green bonds in the current century. There will be an assessment of the primary factors of demand and supply with which they aid in drawing inferences from particular and distinctive features behind the drift seen in the climate bond. The quantifiable features as well relate to this project assumes the experiment applied in defining the trend in supply and demand relationships.

The analysis of data will entail using IBM SPSS V.20 (2014).  Paired T-test will be used to determine the respective P values that either accept or reject the previously stated hypotheses. Since the calculated P value (0.007) is greater than 0.005, therefore, we reject the alternative hypothesis (H1) which postulates that there will be no significance difference between the impacts of investments should make, and even what investments areas may count as green

Analytical Analysis

 F-Test

To come up with a conclusion that there was a significant difference in climate change and the change of increase of supply and demand, the F-Test was used at a 0.05 (alpha) level of importance.  The F-Test findings were attained using statistics examination instrument in Microsoft Excel.  The formulation used to produce the outcomes is given below in by the equation 1.

F= S12 over S22

T- Test

Harmonized dual-sample T-Tests were employed to decide if the relationships stated and hypothesis indicated are significant to this study. These experiments were produced using IBM SPSS. The T-Test was produced using a 0.05 level of correlation.

Method of Analysis

Tools such as regressions graphs will be used analyze Empirical data. Stata software will nullify the meaning of the information collected. Data collected will process very first and linking it to the valid source when Stata software has been used. The ability of Stata software will assist to determine the current and past report, as well as the rate of increase and decrease in different features of climate bond, will be a simplified task.

Sources of Data

The proposal will mostly reference on second-hand information. The importance of secondary inferences will broaden the point of view the research topic as it will not narrow itself within particular anticipations of the subject. The impacts of this will bring varied and comprehensive suitable information that will greatly lend the authority of the deductions made after the research project. Data sources will range from conducting case studies useful in examining international experience and relate to the green bond case on climate change mitigation in the aim of risk management about supply and demand. Second is conducting interviews as the primary approach to getting information on the issuance and the use of earnings of green bonds from the current successful cases and their relevance to sustainable finance reform and climate change mitigation (Johnson 2016, p. 5). This is also the primary approach to sorting out the stakeholder perception for green board implementing its strategies. Conducting interviews with the World Bank and IFC, as the primary green bond market issuers, composed an important part of the case studies on this topic.

Ethical Consideration

To guarantee accountability of this proposal research, scholarly articles will be solely used. The interrelationship of the study is assured given that all references linked with academic are published. Because I will draw most of the information from secondary sources, it will be irrelevant to mind the issues concerning the consent or harming the respondents in any way.

Literature Review

The general objective of the green bond market aids in mobilizing some private corporations funding for sound weather and ecologically – maintainable investments and support improve transparency of environmental funding (Shishlov, Morel & Cochran 2016, p.10). This proposal purposes of sketching a consistent structure to influence the records of developments with which green bond markets incomes have been assigned. This work reflects needs by the investor community and has been welcomed and encouraged in the 2015 update concerning the green bond market principles. These are a voluntary course of action which acclaim integrity as well as discovery plus promote transparency in the growth and development of green bond market (Cochu, et al., 2016, p.38).

The green bond standards concede with it firm values that formerly none of recognized criteria’s aimed to influence reports on the green bond plans, plus invites as well inspire enterprises, comprising of the leading green bonds investors who aid in creating a platform used to influence reporting whereby other people can embrace their requirements. While waiting for additional coordination is met, green bond integrity calls for a greater worth, entailing exposure to procedures as well as core underlying conventions.

This document solely sketches central ideologies as well as approvals and recommends vital signs in both divisions – risk management primarily to combat climate change and secondly, the heightened supply and demand of green bonds in debt capital markets. There are also reference templates that provide issuers with a reference as they develop their reporting (Wenxin, Nguyen & Narayanaswamy 2016, p.2).

In the article “The US green bond market battles with its image and its published reports,” Fildes (2016, p.1) describes the occurrences of bond markets. His primary emphasis is towards approval of the Paris contract between China and US signed back in 2016 during G20 summit conference. Following his case, he says the approval means that the measures embraced would later turn to international laws. Immediately it is globally inaugurated as a law; bodies globally follow similar collections of guidelines so as to handle environmental pollution phenomena specifically in connection green bond market. Fildes (2016, p.1) postulates by arguing communal held accountable projects are restricted further use sponsoring preservation strategies. Both China and U.S signed a contract for the implementation of that same contract. Currently, both countries nearly contribute to 40% concerning the damage generated by a change in a world’s climate (Shishlov Morel and Cochran 2016, p.14).

Drawing reference from Price (2015, p.1), in the article, “Mexico green bond might jump-start market,” his report contains theories that explain the enthusiasm most countries have in taking their position globally to the anticipated low-carbon discharge into the environment. The distribution of funds in the market follows the state plans targeted at changing Mexico into a green economy (Cochu, et al., 2016, p. 69). Referring the theories projected in context with the initial action of climate bonds, evidence shows how rules play essential duties in distribution as well as acceptance of ties in the market. Those who donates towards climate bond market incline mostly towards US and EU to justify the utmost approvals into the bond (DuPont, Levitt & Bilmes 2015, p.12)

Description of a new bond in the market has remained to be a misery (Wilkins, et al. 2016, p. 12). Irrespective of this, Value projects sureness towards forthcoming strategies of climate bonds in Mexico denoting the nation’s punctuality over the task that is to be accomplished. Recognized profound changes to the market during the previous years has aided Mexican securities to maintain its right image in the worldwide shareholders. Applying some laws in the native market during the approval of the money, Nacional Financiera, the development bank the distributed the funds inclined toward the intercontinental market so as to approve the primary bonds (Fu 2012, p. 10). Despite the bank anticipated additional company approval, brings a challenge to this corporations to accept such a bid from a fiscal Institute with a capacity of National Financiera. Many of these entities opt to transact with bigger organizations (Clapp, Alfsen, Lund and Pillay 2016, p.18). The function of the body plays a fundamental duty in defining the consequences of accepting the green funds distributed.

Gerhold (2016, p.34) states his argument by mainly explores the issues of green bonds markets delving its growth universally for previous years. Gerhold (2016, p. 34) says there is a great increase in the green bond market. Basing the author arguments, some factors are hard to be ignored when scrutinizing green bond market. Such aspects relate to socially responsible investment and environmental, communal and administrative components (Robins & Knight 2012, p. 16). The author continues to state that such elements play a role in anticipating investors attributes towards climate funds. The investment was seen to poses reduced risk in comparison with old bonds in the market (Petkov, Michael, Kurt 2016, p.6). Levy exemptions on climate bonds show the benefit disparity is notably bigger, which is another aspect that additionally cushions the project contrary to the impacts of dangerous market drifts.

The book as well states further advantages of the climate bond projects with which they amass to the shareholders plus the debtors. The bond market strives in building a good reputation of public obligation which draws other customers towards this entity contributing to higher sales (Reichelt 2010, p.3). Added advantage, particularly to investors, as free entrance to reduced money financing from the governments such as the World Bank that is keen on funding events intended at preserving the surroundings plus monitoring the change of global climate.

From the article by Ludvigsen (2015, p. 1), the world says that the Green Bonds appeal private sector change of world’s climate. Ludvigsen (2015, p.1) further explains how the way climate bond market contributes in bringing multiplicity in the foundation of financing for enterprises vital to challenge the dangers of world’s climate changes brings about. Investors have been granted with a large collection of projects opportunities particularly to investors willing to separate as well as distich from cases that fuel-intensive aiding to prove the existence of some shareholder funds for green possessions (Wilkins, Taron & Xenia 2015, p.5). Referring the World Bank findings, climate bonds are mandated to draw more dependent enterprise projects in funding organizations designed at making a green budget (Wieckowska 2013, p.153). This shareholder incline towards the World Bank plus from global funding organization to be given directives with procedures concerning the distribution of such funds to increase the money for events considered as green market friendly (Kidney 2015; Hoffman & Henn 2008, p. 393). Additionally, the World Bank gives tributes to the accumulated levies in the climate bond market for the development in the quantities of asset directors for their responsibilities to raise funds for such projects in commercial tools which campaign towards low-carbon emissions.

An additional objective aspect that is coined in the surge of demand and supply of climate market is the Enterprises controlled by joints of financiers at the opening of 2013 to inaugurate the climate Bond Ideologies (GBP) (Kidd 2015, p. 2). The main goal was to bring about adjustment for the actions of shareholders and debtors building a bigger integrity (Hui 2016, p.1). The GBP postulates opportunities whereby the incomes of climate bond projects might be streamed into investments. According to Clapp, et al. (2016, p.15), 50 of the biggest stakeholders have by now dedicated their effort towards the values creating a broader acceptance customary for business performers. The profits realized in the low-carbon release of greenhouse gasses plus air pollution has contributed to invite new contributors in the green bond market (Saha 2016, p.1)

“Unpolluted fossil fuel interventions has authorized climate bonds market in India,” the argument by Khouri (2015, p.1), explains the green market in relation with a particular emphasis in India. The nation is concerned for developing its artificial fuels holding more. Formation of a joint enterprise between the US and India in establishing an enterprise located in India is regarded as a true and also maintainable way to elevate the potential of the nation in green energy (Su 2015, p.23). The high charge of taking loans is a factor that requires thorough reexamining. Investors associated with extended investments should look for a cheap source of financing so as to maintain environment pollution mitigation (Tao 2016; Breen and Campbell 2017, p.356).

Conclusion

We contacted with interested parties who have faith that there is a full capacity to create this project in a manner that guides private markets to look into critical environmental problems. Their size, multiplicity of purposes, and depth of interest in the sector advocate actual prospective for development in green permanent proceeds investment. The prospect of the climate bond economy is to develop and meet those requirements of the organization, and retail investors of all kinds will entirely rely on the capacity of issuers have to fund projects, the issue at the gauge, plus associated with stakeholder-supported principles for contents and impacts. Investors will require quantifying what they feel comfortable with as “GREEN” as well as the creditworthiness and financial characteristics they anticipate from green products. The overall challenge of balancing principles across the sub-sectors of green, from infrastructure to real estate to maintainable forestry to corporate bonds, will stand to be a problem.

References

Avery, H., 2016. Where are the US banks on green bonds? Euromoney. [Online] Available at: http://www.euromoney.com/Article/3575691/Where-are-the-US-banks-on-green-bonds.html [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Balboa, C.M., 2016. Accountability of Environmental Impact Bonds: The Future of Global Environmental Governance? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), pp.33-41.

Bergset, L. and Fichter, K., 2015. Green start-ups–a new typology for sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation research. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(3), pp.118-144.

Breen, S. and Campbell, C., 2017. Legal Considerations for a Skyrocketing Green Bond Market. Natural Resources and Environment, 31(3), pp.16-20.

Chowdhury, T., Datta, R. and Mohajan, H., 2013. Green finance is essential for economic development and sustainability. International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics & Management, 3(10), pp.104-109.

Clapp, C., Alfsen, K.H., Lund, H.F. and Pillay, K., 2016. Green Bonds and Environmental Integrity: Insights from CICERO Second Opinions. CICERO Policy Note; 2016: 01. Available at: https://www.environmental-finance.com/assets/files/research/11-05-16-cicero.pdf [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Climate Bonds Initiative, 2015. 2015 Green Bond Market Roundup-USD 41.8 bn labelled green bonds issued in 2015. Available at: https://www.climatebonds.net/files/files/2015%20GB%20Market%20Roundup%2003A.pdf [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Climate Bond Initiative, n.d. Improving risk-return profile: Increasing returns or reducing risks. [Online] Available at: https://www.climatebonds.net/policy/policy-areas/improving-risk-return-profile [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Cochu, A., et al., 2016. Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments. European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Fu, C.H., 2012. Bonds for Trees: A Good Idea Hoping to Become Real. Journal of Environmental Investing, 3(1), pp.9-27.

Cranford, M., Parker, C. and Trivedi, M., 2011. Understanding Forest Bonds. Oxford, UK: Global Canopy Programme.

Della Croce, R., Kaminker, C. and Stewart, F., 2011. The role of pension funds in financing green growth initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, (10), p.1-66.

DuPont, C.M., Levitt, J. and Bilmes, L., 2015. Green Bonds and Land Conservation:

The Evolution of a New Financing Tool. [Online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2700311 [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Fildes, T., 2016. US green bond market wrestles with reporting and reputation. Globalcapital. [Online] Available at: http://www.globalcapital.com/article/zr0xm3zmlg5h/us-green-bond-market-wrestles-with-reporting-and-reputation [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Gerhold, M., 2016. A look at the rise of the green bond market. Globalcapital. [Online] Available at: http://www.globalcapital.com/article/z40n8v8knywy/a-look-at-the-rise-of-the-green-bond-market [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Heinkel, R., Kraus, A. and Zechner, J., 2001. The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 36(04), pp.431-449.

Hoffman, A.J. and Henn, R., 2008. Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization and Environment, 21(4), pp.390-419.

Hui, R., 2016. China shows leadership in global green finance push. Globalcapital. [Online] Available at: http://www.globalcapital.com/article/zrx86yszkhhh/china-shows-leadership-in-global-green-finance-push [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Jackson, G., (2017). Green bond market faces growing pains. Available at:  https://www.ft.com/content/fc537c36-2982-11e6-8b18-91555f2f4fde [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Johnson, E., 2016. Green light for global bond investors as china sprints again. Institutional Investor-International Edition, 41, 8, pp. 1-11,

Khouri, C., 2015. Clean energy agencies push for green bond market in India. Globalcapital. [Online] Available at: http://www.globalcapital.com/article/ps8mzt7ml4sk/clean-energy-agencies-push-for-green-bond-market-in-india [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Kidd, D., 2015. Indexes Sprout Up as Green Bonds Take Root. Investment Risk and Performance Feature Articles, 2015(1), pp.1-4.

Kidney, S., 2015. Bonds and Climate Change. In CFA Institute Conference Proceedings Quarterly (Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 44-53). CFA Institute.

Kochetygova, J. and Jauhari, A., 2014. Climate Change, Green Bonds and Index Investing: The New Frontier. SandP Dow Jones Indices.

Ludvigsen, P., 2015. Green bonds offer a unique set of rewards to investors, argues Phillip Ludvigsen. Available at:

https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/analysis/advanced-topics-in-green-bonds-rewards.html [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Mathews, J.A. and Kidney, S., 2012. Financing climate-friendly energy development through bonds. Development Southern Africa, 29(2), pp.337-349.

Petkov, M., Michael, W., Kurt, E. F., 2016. Evaluating the environmental impact of projects aimed at adapting to climate change. RatingsDirect. S&P Global Ratings.

Price, E., 2015. Mexico green bond first could jump-start market. International Financial Law Review. [Online] Available at: http://www.iflr.com/Article/3505632/Mexico-green-bond-first-could-jump-start-market.html  [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Reichelt, H., 2010. Green bonds: a model to mobilize private capital to fund climate change mitigation and adaptation projects. The Euromoney Environmental Finance Handbook, p.1-7.

Robins, N. and Knight, Z., 2012. Bonds and climate change: the state of the market in 2012. HSBC Global Research, p. 2-29.

Saha, D., 2016. Green bonds take root in the U.S. municipal bond market. Available at:

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/10/25/green-bonds-take-root-in-the-u-s-municipal-bond-market/  [Accessed 17 February 2017].

Shishlov, I., Morel, R. and Cochran, I., 2016. Beyond transparency: unlocking the full potential of green bonds. Institute for Climate Economics, juin, p. 3-27.

S&P Global Ratings, 2016. Guest Opinion: Aligning 2016 green finance expectations with green bond index strategies. RatingsDirect.

Su, M., 2015. Can Green Bonds Help Air Pollution Mitigation in China? Potential and Challenges. IIIEE Master Thesis.

Sustainability, G.B.M., 2014. State-Backed Green Bonds Emerge Following International Model. Policy, p.1-6.

Tao, J.Y., 2016. Utilizing Green Bonds for Financing Renewable Energy Projects in Developing Asian Countries. Chapters, pp.343-381.

Veys, A., 2010. The Sterling Bond Markets and Low Carbon or Green Bonds. E3G, UK, p. 1-38.

Wenxin, L., Nguyen, Q. T., and Narayanaswamy, M., 2016. How banks can seize opportunities in climate and green investment. EMCompass, 27. Washington, DC. : World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/334501486539681923/pdf/112688-BRI-EMCompass-Note-27-Banks-and-Climate-Finance-FINAL.pdf [Accessed 17 Feb. 2016].

Wieckowska, M., 2013. The role bonds in financing climate resilient economy. Copernican Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(1), p.153-167.

Wilkins, M., Taron, W., and Xenia, X., 2015. Corporate bond market shows its green shoots. RatingsDirect: Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, McGraw Hill Financial.

Wilkins, et al., 2016. Proposal for a green bond evaluation tool. RatingsDirect: S&P Global Ratings.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?