The article is an exploration of the response of Australia to climate change between the decade preceding 2007. Particularly, emphasis is made on the role of issue framing and non decision in shaping the overall response of the country. The author allude to a collaborative approach in which players from both the state and the private sector selectively highlighted key issues thus necessitating the framing of the problem with utmost specificity. Through this approach, the complex and multidimensional problem of climate change attracted corresponding solutions for the various issues identified by the actors. The success with which the country trivialized the global problem of climate change presents a scenario of suppression of important aspects of climate change thus keeping them away from the political agenda of a country. Through this approach, the government rendered the problem of climate change to be effectively governable and therefore not a threat to the dominant interest of the country. The country used its special profile to negotiate better treatment among other countries and even give excuses against the ratification of key statutes.

The case of Australia provides a perfect example of the ills of having national interest ahead of genuine environmental concerns. The article emphasizes the need to desist from such practices as advanced by Australia in defense of its contribution to global climate change. The paper further explores the steps used by the country in waging a propaganda war against climate change and its perceived role in the management of the phenomenon. By citing specific speeches from government records as well as newspapers, the author manages to draw conclusions on Australia’s unwillingness to fight climate change. In one instance, official from the government of Australia defended the country stating that the overall contribution to climate change was insignificant. In addition, the author explores the country’s tendency to lay blame on developing countries such as China and India that are perceived to increase their contribution to climate change in the next few years. In this regard, the author manages to provide support for his arguments against Australia’s modus operandi.

The author use four narratives in explaining the framing of climate change by the Australian government. Through such a framing, the government was able to sideline the problem as one that did not require its intervention. Indeed, Australia has often cited its unique characteristics and attributes in defense of its inaction against climate change. However, these narratives are nothing but a false and lame excuse for its lack of action. The author effectively paints the country’s response to climate change in negative light owing to the non decision making that shaped its treatment of climate change. In truth, Australia does not seem to be committed to the reduction of greenhouse gas emission. Quite often, the administration is cited as arguing that its country is large and has a smaller population thus warranting the increased demand for transportation energy. However, this is not the case as the energy used is often consumed through vehicles that emit high volumes of greenhouse gases. The article perfectly articulates this argument through a consideration of the information presented and crosschecking the same to ascertain facts from myths.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?