INTRODUCTION

Conservatism can be described as the situation or culture of resistance to new ideas and systems after ghetto French Revolution. After this revolution, a group of the society developed an opposing regime to the new ideology that was being imported from French. It is important to note that this sophisticated mechanism of defense that was established from nature of disapproval of anything new imposed to them as well as the need to conserve and defend their traditional political and cultural systems. These ideas were considered dangerous by this group of people. This paper, therefore, gives insight on the issues surrounding the development of converts as well as the combating measures that were put in place in regards to the same.

QUESTION ONE:

As previously mentioned in the introduction, the French revolution brought about new ideologies and aspects and an overall transformation to the systems of the society. These transformations ranged from political economic and cultural elements that had to test first on the members of the community before actually being implemented. It is important to note that all these transformation and ideologies were initially from France, and therefore had a French orientation. According to Edmund (1790), the French revolution was bringing in revolutionary ideas towards the constitution, the existing monarchy, the political arrangements, and hierarchy, as well as the religion. He felt that these transformations would have more negative implications to the native European citizens. Therefore,  the thinkers believed that these ideas needed to be combated. The main reasons behind the development of a resistant nature to the ideologies as mentioned above was the great need to conserve their political and economic systems as they had for all those years served them right. Equally, they felt that the two fundamental aspects or principles  that had governed them for many years: a gentleman spirit and religion were being jeopardized by the French Revolution.

QUESTION 2

According to Edmund,  the French revolution was importing new ideas and aspects that had French orientation. He felt that this revolution would render the members of their society in a situation of social, economic, and political slavery. He states that “You would have had a free constitution, a strong monarchy, a disciplined army,  a reformed and venerated clergy, and a mitigated and spirited nobility. “He further states that France,  when she let’s loose, the reins of regal authority, doubled the license, of a ferocious dissoluteness in manners, and an insolent irreligion in opinions and practices: and has extended through all ranks of life.” It is evident that Edmund gave much priority and concern to the development of his immediate society. This seen by his sentiments that bring home the point that insufficient resistance to the French anarchy would with no doubt render the people into slavery. According to him, the French revolution was dangerous as it would jeopardize the freedom that individuals had in their live

According to Joseph De Maistre (1809), his converts nature was stricken by the fact that the French revolution was bringing in a constitution that would ineffectively govern the people. According to him, the adoption of a constitution, which is written law would not sustainably govern man. He goes on and states that “Man cannot create a constitution,  and no legitimate constitution can be written.”He further states that “No real and great constitution can be based on written law, since men themselves, instruments, in turn of the establishes institution, do not know what is to become and since imperceptible growth is the true promise of durability in all things.” Equally, he felt the revolution would be dangerous in regards to washing away the society’s religious beliefs. He further suggested that the future generations would throw away most of the fundamental principles to the winds, primarily by paying more attention to education and science,  and not social values and beliefs. To him, this was dangerous as it jeopardized the continuation of the cultural aspects of their society.

According to Metternich (1820), the new French ideologies would bring about a new political system and hierarchy. According to him,  this new political arrangements in leadership would disrupt the unity of their society. For this reason,  he felt the urge of shunning and advocating for ignorance of the French ideas. He clearly states that Union between the monarchs is the basis for the policy which must now be followed to save the society from total ruins. ”

QUESTION 3

What were the practical measures to combat them suggested by Metternich and what did he hope to accomplish by enacting these measures?

According to Metternich’s beliefs and mindset, the most accurate strategy was to uphold a unified society that would strongly and significant conserve the traditional political, social, economic, and cultural values of the society. Equally, he felt a great need for governments liberty and responsibilities to protect its people from the French invasion. He states that “We are convinced that society can no longer be saved without strong and vigorous resolutions on the part of the government. ” This means that the most outstanding practical measure advocated by Metternich in full governments involvement in the fight against the new ideologies and aspects from the French invaders. Metternich had strong hopes and belief that the values of the society will be significantly upheld, as the overall foundations of its existence will be protected. These societal values according to Metternich are religion, the morality of the general public, customs and traditions, law and order, and full protection of the people’s rights.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the conversation nature that developed after the French revolution was based on the political, social, and economic changes it posed to the society. The above insight developed from the scholars as mentioned above gives us knowledge in regards to the contributing factors to this resistance, as well as the strategies suggested to be put in place to combat the same. It is essential to appreciate the fact that government involvement and protection and conservation of the traditional, social, cultural, political, and economic values would be a sustainable and robust foundation for the conservancies. It is therefore evident that the ultimate goal for this group that did not appreciate the new ideologies from the French was to promote their original values as they believed they offered them not only a better state of mind but also a sustainable social arrangement.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?