Computer Science has always been an interesting and intriguing field. There are numerous issues and concepts taking place every day. Whatever people think to be a current trend usually gets faced-out in a matter of a short period. This is due to the inventions that are taking place now and then. The concept of computer-controlled infrastructure has been there for some time. It has not gained the desired momentum due to various bottlenecks along the way. The major bottleneck is the debate surrounding the whole concept (Silhavy et al., 2014). There are people supporting the concept while there are others opposed to the practice. Regardless, computer controlled infrastructure is the appropriate way to go in future based on various benefits involved.

To begin with, computer controlled infrastructure can help reduce the risk that is created when humans are in control of infrastructure. Humans are usually prone to errors. This is due to the many issues that surround them and the nature of activities that they are expected to balance every day. They are full of emotions that tend to affect the decision-making process on most occasions (Petit, 2015). Some emotions are not even involved with the nature of activity being conducted at that time, but for some reasons, the emotions tend to surface anyway. The emotions were derived from one sector, but they are now affecting a different sector. This means that when humans are involved in controlling infrastructure, the probability of errors is usually high. This means that the level of inefficiency is high. This aspect is likely to result in accidents in various infrastructures like airplanes and trams. What makes computer controlled infrastructures superior under this respect, is the fact that they are not affected by emotions. This means that they will always operate at the optimal level. The system will always work in a manner that it was programmed to regardless of the situation. This ensures efficiency at all times.

Computer controlled infrastructures also have a high probability of surviving adverse environments. A good example is a war-torn country. There is usually an increased probability of saving people’s lives without placing others at risk. An unmanned vehicle will save many lives and result in the destruction of the enemy strongholds. A favorable example is the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usually known as the drone. It is normally an aircraft that does not have a human pilot on board. It is normally useful in military and other special operation applications. UAV’s are mostly preferred when the missions involved are dull, dangerous and dirty for manned aircraft (Benjamin, 2013). A good example is how United States military found it difficult to fight irregular warfare when it entered the global war on terror. That is the moment when they realized that to fight the asymmetric threats associated with irregular warfare, they needed to conduct fast and destructive operations that would make it possible to incapacitate the enemy. Using manned aircraft was not working, and that is why they opted to go for drones (Benjamin, 2013). This is an indication that computer controlled infrastructures are more efficient under this aspect compared to those controlled by humans. It is an indication that it is a trend that might be implemented on a larger scale in future.

The credibility of computer controlled infrastructures is based on the fact that the relevant equipments involved are developed by professionals. These are people with the desired knowledge and technical know-how in various fields of specialization. Whatever they come up with is duly researched and developed in an appropriate manner. There are tests conducted before a certain technology can be used to ensure that everything is in order. This ensures that the probabilities of failure are very low.

Individuals opposed to the usage of computer controlled infrastructure might argue on the grounds of its security. They might argue that such infrastructures are prone to the activities of hackers that have ill-intentions, which is very true. However, this is something that can be taken care off. Individuals responsible for development of these infrastructures have the ability to create firewalls that cannot be penetrated by third-parties (Knapp & Langill, 2015). This serves to assure the security and safety of these infrastructures.

Another argument that might come around is that of employment. Deployment of this type of infrastructures would render the people that were initially in control unemployed. However, this is a two-sided affair. As those employment opportunities are being reduced, other avenues are being created. There are people needed to develop these systems from scratch. They would not have been employed if there was no need for the systems. After the systems have been developed, there is the need to employ people that will be responsible for running them. These people are meant to ensure that everything is working as expected hence they need to be there. Another employment opportunity is created as a result. In the long-run, there will be the establishment of industries that are responsible for production of materials involved in the development of these computerized infrastructures. The industries will create an employment opportunity for the public (Ford, 2016). These are examples that show how the aspect of employment balances itself. As a result, the use of computer-controlled infrastructure will not result in decreased employment opportunities.

In conclusion, computer controlled infrastructure is the appropriate way to go in future based on various benefits involved. Computer science is a very interesting field. It keeps evolving from time to time hence giving people some things that they did not expect. Recent trends in this field show a strong indication of how computer controlled infrastructures might take effect on a larger scale in future than it is currently. This is because people are starting to identify the various benefits involved. In some aspects, computerized infrastructures seem superior to human controlled infrastructures though not in all facets. However, nothing is 100% perfect; anything bearing advantages will definitely have its share of disadvantages. Most people opposed to the idea of computer controlled infrastructure tend to be one dimensional. They only look at one aspect that is not appealing and fail to recognize the other good parts. It is always good to be open-minded in order to make informed conclusive decisions.

References

Benjamin, M. (2013). Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control. New york: Verso Books.

Ford, M. (2016). Rise of the robots: Technologyand the threat of a jobless future. Basic Books.

Hyard, A. (2013). Non-technological innovations for sustainable transport. Technological             Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1375-1386.

Knapp, E. D., & Langill, J. T. (2015). Hacking Industrial Control Systems. Industrial Network      Security,171-207.

Petit, P. (2015). Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30(5).

Silhavy, R., Senkerik, R., Oplatkova, Z. K., Silhavy, P., & Prokopova, Z. (2014). Modern Trends             and Techniques in Computer Science3rd Computer Science On-line Conference 2014. New york: Springer.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?