Summary

Type of Study

The mode of study, in this case, was experimental based on the measures that were being undertaken by the key players. The central concept involved the manifestation of humor in different instances. Therefore, this research was specific to the effect of psychological distance on humor. Hence, it was appropriate to have a picture of everything before coming into conclusion. An experimental technique would likely provide the expected results that can be used for further analysis in the subsequent stages. The study also incorporated an element of predictability based on past reviews. This process involves moving beyond by understanding the dynamism of humorous response. The experimentation was supposed to confirm some of the theoretical claims that are associated with the subject; humor. Hence, it provided an adequate way of comprehending different versions.

Variables

An independent variable does not change in the research process. In this case, humor that is triggered by positive information seemed to bring in the fixed element, hence an independent variable. A dependent variable was based on the interpretation of the humorous responses by the different individuals who took part in the study. These two aspects are critical for any research process to be deemed thorough. Therefore, in this case, the emphasis was placed on both parts so that comprehension of the whole concept would be adjusted as required. It is pertinent for the individuals taking part in a study to be privy to some facts so that their responses can aid in providing absolute statements that can be analyzed.

Method (s)

The study involved 1,064 online panelists. Therefore, the approach that was used was exceedingly unique because most research procedures tend to rely on data that has been collected through traditional methods. Independent samples from 100 participants were collected at different times (McGraw, Williams & Warren, 2013).  The online survey was based on responding to tweets that had been shared. There were three tweets in total. The participants in the study were required to evaluate some of the tweets and provide their reactions. They were also required to provide details on their geographical locations so that their responses could be studied conclusively. The random selection of participants also helped in comprehending the data that had been obtained for further analysis in the subsequent phases of the study.

Summary of Findings

Crucial information was used in the results section of the study. It was supposed to determine the time point at which the participants encountered the tweets and whether it affected the humour as was perceived in the three stimuli. It was deduced that the timing was constant among all the three tweets. Under offensiveness, it was found that there was an effect on the stimuli. Hence, the tweets had some differences in terms of the perceived offensiveness. Further, the post hoc contrast analysis found out that the results were consistent with benign violation theory. The findings also reiterated that confusion affected the amount of humor that is generated since the tweets were spread at three different times.

Critique

Validity

The study seems to be valid based on the professionalism that has been showcased in the whole process. First, the determination of humor has been done over a while. Further, explicitly, the number of participants that have been used have been confirmed to be 1,064 (McGraw, Williams & Warren 2013). Therefore, it cannot be said that the outcome that was obtained came from unspecified sources. Further, the number of tweets that have been used in the whole exercise has also been mentioned. These pieces of evidence show that the researchers were serious with the mission that they had. In some studies, some specifics might not be provided, but in this case, everything tends to have been presented, hence aiding in boosting the validity of the entire study. Reliability implies that the information that has been provided is verifiable. This has been supported by the theoretical claims that have been supported by evidential bits from the study. For example, the benign violation theory has mainly been mentioned in the research.

Interpretation of findings

Most studies tend to have an area where proper analysis of the results is done. In this case, there is no significant difference as the same has been applied to ensure that anyone going through the phases that have been outlined does not get lost. One of the most outstanding areas that are noteworthy is that there was the incorporation of literature in the interpretation of findings. Therefore, the results that were obtained were analyzed and processed following the existing theoretical facts that have been outlined in different forms of literature. Little can be added to water down the efforts that the researchers invested in the entire study. Various scopes of the study were highlighted effectively. The effect of other forms of distance on humor has been explained in depth. The preparation for Hurricane Sandy has been broken down in the form of its impact on the human brain, specifically, the bit that processes humor. Hence, it can be stated that most of the issues in the study have been captured in the interpretation.

Ethical Safeguards

It is appropriate for ethical considerations to be made during any exercise of this magnitude. Failure to do so might invite legal proceedings or any other unforeseen action. However, in this case, nothing seems to have gone wrong since everything was covered. The privacy of the participants was not breached in any way that could have been offending to them. Consequently, the online survey that was primarily reliant on the response to tweets was conducted effectively with minimal flaws. Further, the data that was obtained was handled correctly before it was used in the subsequent stages of the study.

Additional Implications

The study unraveled several things, some of which had not been known by the masses. However, there are some openings that might have been left. First, humor is dependent on other factors such as personality and culture. Therefore,  effective analyzing might a tedious task. Further, using or quoting the same information in the future might jeopardize the quality of the results. Additionally, there is an issue that relates to the variance of geographical positions that might also affect the universality of the results that are obtained at the same time.

Brief

The study was primarily based on analyzing the “distance” effect on humor. Therefore, a case was provided that involved the tweeter responses on three stimuli. The results were obtained after incorporating 1, 064 people in the entire exercise. Since the approach was experimental, it was not very procedural. Additionally, the analysis of the results was in tandem with the theoretical concepts that are related to the subject. Hence, it can be deduced that the process was effectively conducted.

Reference

McGraw A, Williams, E & Warren C. (2013).  The Rise and Fall of Humour: Psychological           Distance Modulates Humorous Response to Tragedy,

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?