ACCREDITATION AUDIT – TASK #4
COMPETENCIES
705.2.4 Regulatory Audit
The graduate ensures a healthcare organization is in compliance with mandatory regulatory audit guidelines pertaining to the organization.
705.3.6 Organization Plans
The graduate prepares organizational plans such as disaster plans, contingency plans, or staffing plans.
705.4.3 Compliance
The graduate identifies and helps a healthcare organization comply with applicable healthcare statutes and regulations.
INTRODUCTION
The accreditation process seeks to help organizations identify and resolve problems and to inspire them to improve the safety and quality of care and services provided. The process focuses on systems critical to the safety and the quality of care, treatment, and services.
For this task, you will assume the role of director of accreditation. You will review and analyze the materials (e.g., records, previous audit, trends, e-mails) provided in the case study to prepare for the audit. You will need to look across all departments and examine trends and patient care issues to determine readiness.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Note: If you have problems opening the Audit Case Study – Task 4 Artifacts file, download the file first, and then open it
RUBRIC
ARTICULATION OF RESPONSE (CLARITY, ORGANIZATION, MECHANICS):
COMPETENT
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A1:COMPLIANCE STATUS
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the current compliance status of the healthcare facility.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the current compliance status of the healthcare facility.
A2:NONCOMPLIANT TRENDS
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of any trends evident in the case study that may cause the organization to not be compliant with the Joint Commission standards for patient care.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of any trends evident in the case study that may cause the organization to not be compliant with the Joint Commission standards for patient care.
A3A:STAFFING PATTERNS
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate support, of data to determine the staffing patterns of the patient care unit.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial support, of data to determine the staffing patterns of the patient care unit.
A3B:STAFFING PLAN
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a staffing plan, with adequate detail, to minimize the number of falls in the patient care unit.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a staffing plan, with substantial detail, to minimize the number of falls in the patient care unit.
B:SOURCES (not part of main paper)
COMPETENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style.
HIGHLY COMPETENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Accreditation_Audit_Case_Study_-_General_Artifacts.zip
Accreditation_Audit_Case_Study_-_Task_4_Artifacts.zip
GENERAL ARTIFACTS
TASK 4 ARTIFACTS